Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sathyathinte Nizhalil

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 15:04, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sathyathinte Nizhalil

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable film. only ref IMDB. (one of MANY malasian movie stubs created by same editor)

previously deleted via PROD. second PROD iteration procedurally declined due to previous deletion and directed to go to AFD, so here we are! Gaijin42 (talk) 13:03, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 26 September 2013 (UTC) Note: Please consider reading WP:INDAFD which includes some points about WikiProject India AFDs. Those may or may not be applicable here. Tito☸Dutta 01:54, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep and seek active assistance from Project India. It appears actor Sudheer won a 'Best Actor Award' from the Kerala State Government in 1975 for this film, so we might safely presume it received some sort of coverage... but sadly, most of the Indian Newspaper archives do not store content for before 2000 or so. If Project India cannot source this, my second choice would be to perhaps redirect this to director Babu Nandancode. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 07:43, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, | Uncle Milty | talk | 01:18, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 12:17, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.